2000 W Renault Megane 2.0 16v IDE Monaco Â£3700

Newbie Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 16

2000 W Reg 2.0 16v Renault Megane Coupe IDE Monaco

HPI Clear, certificate to Prove

Glasses Valuation came up as Â£4,495 with the cars current milage, so this is a steal at 3700 considering is condition and care.

Onto the car:

140BHP
Rare Model in Hologram Grey
2 owners
85,000miles
Air Con
Full Leather
Electric Sunroof
Electric Mirrors
ABS
Factory Cat1 Alarm
16" Factory Alloys
FSH, very recent cambelt change, well mainted and serviced
11 Months MOT and 6 months Tax

Nice original car in SPOTLESS condition, never had any problems with the car, very reliable.

For anyone that doesnt know, its not a diesel, IDE mean Injection Directe Essence, in English, Direct Injection, gives it good performance whilst still maintaining good economy, 35-45mpg average.

BASED IN WORCESTERSHIRE

Tel
mob: 007957920077
home: 01386 791595

Email: steve@stevejwilliams.co.uk

PICS

thanks

FCS Event Manager Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 3680

That certainly is one very nice looking Megane!

Out of my price range sadly but i just had to comment on how nice it looks.

Why are you selling it?

Site Subscriber Joined: 13 Oct 2004 Posts: 4722

ive never seen one that looks like that before..

FCS Event Manager Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 3680

Its gorgeous, if i had the cash i would seriously be thinking of adding it to my collection

Newbie Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 16

Wicked Neo";p="81118 wrote:

That certainly is one very nice looking Megane!

Out of my price range sadly but i just had to comment on how nice it looks.

Why are you selling it?

thanks for the comments, no real reason, just fancied a change, am getting a leon cupra instead Smile

i could flex to maybe 3500 if someone was to bring me some cash Wink

i need a quick sale as iv got a deposit on the leon you see which is why im willing to let it go for well under the book price

Site Subscriber Joined: 13 Oct 2004 Posts: 4722

sell lag!!

Newbie Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 16

eh? lol

Site Subscriber Joined: 13 Oct 2004 Posts: 4722

sorry, ment for neo!

FCS Event Manager Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 3680

coupesteve";p="81153 wrote:

eh? lol

he means i should sell my laguna so i can buy your megane lol

my laguna would not sell for that price roger, yeah its a 2000 with 36,000 miles but its a 1.6 RT Laguna 1 Ph2 lol

Level 3 User Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Posts: 66

Very Nice, didnt know they did a IDE Monaco, Renault should of given them more power though, 200bhp or so, seen as it little bro, the clio has 182 *thinking out loud*

Newbie Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 16

IDE has a lot more torque than the VVT lumps in the 172/182

Independant test figs of 7.4 0-60 doesnt make it a million miles away either.

Also weight is pretty similar in the two vehicles

Level 3 User Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Posts: 66

Have you got a link to that information, says on this site that it get to 60 in 12 seconds...

http://www.wisebuyers.co.uk/motoring/car-specifications/Renault/Megane+%281996-03%29/RE001473/

..which cant be right, have you got another link to the perforamance figures

Newbie Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 16

haha wtf is that site on about!! for a start it covers 1996 to 2003, ph1 all had different engines to ph2 for a start

only online link iv got is parkers buts those are a load of crap 8.2 i think

read the independant in evo mag

Level 3 User Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Posts: 66

Not to worry, lad off the clio forum just mailed me this..

http://www.whatcar.com/car-review-performance.aspx?RT=511&ED=13372&U=1

would like to see the indepenndent figs of 7.4 though, whatcar say 8.6 secs to 60, been told it would cost over a grand to get anyware near them performance figures...

Level 3 User Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Posts: 66

coupesteve";p="81334 wrote:

IDE has a lot more torque than the VVT lumps in the 172/182

It hasnt

coupesteve";p="81334 wrote:

Also weight is pretty similar in the two vehicles

Not even close

Level 3 User Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Posts: 66

Not trying to be a knob mate, just trying to people the right information before they make an informed decision to buy your motorâ€¦.

Newbie Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 16

my weight = 1135
182=1090

less than a person extra weight

and the later ph2's coupes have a tamed 182 lump in 2003, torque is significantly more in comparison
you do realise that renault test there vehicles with a passengar some luggage and a full tank of fuel.

pug do the same, so not sure if its a french thing

the 106 gti was timed at 8.4 or summit, but the VTS was 7.2 both cars are identical, why do u think the 106 was different? different timing methods, similar to this instance

Level 3 User Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Posts: 66

coupesteve";p="81345 wrote:

the 106 gti was timed at 8.4 or summit, but the VTS was 7.2 both cars are identical, why do u think the 106 was different? different timing methods, similar to this instance

Just been over to the pug forum, mark kindly told me that the VTS is quicker because it weighs less (GTI better build quality) and the VTS has slight more torque higher up the rev range..

Level 3 User Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Posts: 66

coupesteve";p="81345 wrote:

you do realise that renault test there vehicles with a passengar some luggage and a full tank of fuel.

Not on sports models....

Anyway..Good luck with the sale mate.

Newbie Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 16

okies, its true about the pugs, the build quality is no better, they use all the same parts, trust me i had one for a year

its wrong of me to try and compare it to a 182 as the 182 is clearly a faster car. The point im trying to make is they are underestiamted, you obviously at first instance thought they were a lot slower than they are

Retroholic Joined: 12 Feb 2004 Posts: 5685

cockney";p="81352 wrote:

coupesteve";p="81345 wrote:

the 106 gti was timed at 8.4 or summit, but the VTS was 7.2 both cars are identical, why do u think the 106 was different? different timing methods, similar to this instance

Just been over to the pug forum, mark kindly told me that the VTS is quicker because it weighs less (GTI better build quality) and the VTS has slight more torque higher up the rev range..

Bollocks, on all points.

Saxo has different gear ratios to give it a quicker 0-60 where the 106 will hammer it everywhere else