Author |
Message |
Mad Pierre
Level 10 User
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 614
|
Posted:
Sat Jan 28, 2006 4:03 pm |
|
ph1, are set up stiffer than ph2's. therefore it will cope better. also less power willbe wasted on a ph1. |
|
|
|
|
Neal
Forum Moderator
Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 7432
|
Posted:
Sat Jan 28, 2006 4:06 pm |
|
they arent set up stiffer, all the suspension components are exactly the same. |
|
|
|
|
bbracer16valver
Retroholic
Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 3315
|
Posted:
Sat Jan 28, 2006 5:56 pm |
|
Neal
Quote: |
they arent set up stiffer, all the suspension components are exactly the same. |
i thought all phase's are the same 1 and 2 in the handling department |
|
|
|
|
Neal
Forum Moderator
Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 7432
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 29, 2006 2:54 am |
|
Well, people keep saying that the phase 1 is stiffer and has a harsher ride, but there is no difference in suspension between them so it's either a psychological thing or down to the weight. |
|
|
|
|
bbracer16valver
Retroholic
Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 3315
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 29, 2006 4:01 am |
|
i did think when i went in a phase1 for the 1st time it was a well harder ride lol (was on the bumpstops)
i donno i seen neo's post somewhere and i says the ph1 hatch 3dr is 55kgs than the ph2 3dr hatch |
Last edited by bbracer16valver on Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:53 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
u33db
Affiliate
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 219
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:52 am |
|
Thought the phase 1 bodyshell was stiffer as they used higher quality metal? |
|
|
|
|
FincH
Site Subscriber
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 569
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 29, 2006 6:18 am |
|
Yeah go for it Chris.
How much are you getting the lump for?
And what's this about 2k and 4k pull is for shite fucked engines? |
|
|
|
|
Mad Pierre
Level 10 User
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 614
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:32 pm |
|
must be down to weight then. My old chammy was stiff. could get the rear wheel lifting on tight bends |
|
|
|
|
JB
Mr Quoter-vator
Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 7405
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 29, 2006 2:45 pm |
|
these cars are so old, most of them prolly do not behave as renault intended them too...they are what they are...each a little bit unique...i cant see the point in going on and on about what they are supposed to be... |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:14 am |
|
well due to working on Iains car (tranton) never had time to pick it up yesterday, gonna need to wait to next weekend due to the business gateway navigator course thingy.
All my cars apart from the ph2 lift the rear wheel going into the drive.
The blue hatch especially, its all new suspension gear and I can hardly bounce the thing. |
|
|
|
|
MicKPM
Affiliate
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 360
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:25 am |
|
Hmmm, no need to hazzard a guess which way I voted At first I was gutted that we went for the F7R over the F4R but now i'm really chuffed and we're hoping to be seeing 200-210bhp fairly soon!
Mad Pierre wrote: |
Yes Deffo, I've been in and seen Leanne megane powered 19. And it's goes well for a ph2 with all the weight in. |
All that weight is going soon aswell Pete... We've finally decided to put the 19 on a diet and remove all that ICE from the boot. Well, it would be an awfull waste now that the management is here and the 45's are on order. Just need to sort out a new radiator, 330cc injectors and a webber inlet for an F7R-710 then we're off for some mapping. Hoping that BenR can sort out the fanimold issue as the price I got for a new one made me shit puppies
Chris, do it - You keeping DIS or going for the Distributor route?
Mick |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:28 am |
|
dunno mick, dizzy is quick and easy, DIS is better though.
Will get it strip it then rebuild it anyway, I will ponder on what to do then. |
|
|
|
|
MicKPM
Affiliate
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 360
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:37 am |
|
Sequential is deffo better yeah and we still get ace MPG at full throttle but as you know it's not the easiest of routes to get running. I'm thinking about ditching it in favour of Batch/Bank fire with the 45's but i'm not sure which is going to give the gains over the next so maybe it's possible to get the sequential working with the TB setup? Also, from what i've heard of vernier pulleys at the minute i'm steering well clear of them as they seem to be letting go all the time... Craig, Stans...fook that! |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:40 am |
|
Bens pullies don't break but are not cheap.
Batch fire is better for power and response tbh. Sequential goes to batch after 4krpm ish anyway.
sequential is good for low emmisions and fuel economy though.
I was reffering to coil packs being better than the dizzy btw.
what cams you running? |
|
|
|
|
MicKPM
Affiliate
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 360
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:49 am |
|
At the minute we're running a set of Piper Cams with a 270 profile and they've deffo given good increases and well worth the £££ IMO but I hear CAT Cams are that little bit better.
I think if you're going to go for an aftermarket EM system then the coilpack DIS igntion will be for you but if not, the distributor option would be far, far easier (But you already know that). |
|
|
|
|
u33db
Affiliate
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 219
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:55 am |
|
Chris H wrote: |
well due to working on Iains car (tranton) never had time to pick it up yesterday, gonna need to wait to next weekend due to the business gateway navigator course thingy.
All my cars apart from the ph2 lift the rear wheel going into the drive.
The blue hatch especially, its all new suspension gear and I can hardly bounce the thing. |
Chris, i'm bringing mine and the other stuff down in a van next weekend as i still need to look at my brakes. If you're needing to pick yours up and don't want to dump it in the back of your car i can give you hand if its not too far away? |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:55 am |
|
I don't have a car to dump it in dougal, chamades and engines don't go!
But I might take you up on it! |
|
|
|
|
u33db
Affiliate
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 219
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:55 am |
|
Nae bother...would be a good excuse to razz arnold clarks rental van around for a wee bit longer! |
|
|
|
|
stan
Gay Rights Activist
Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 1268
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:28 pm |
|
for the record my pulley didnt break....they wont either...
the 5 bolts holding the 2 sections together came loose....nothing to do with the structure/quality |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
Posted:
Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:07 am |
|
in that case matey we can fill it with my scrap metal collection and go get it weighed, might weigh enough to buy us lunch!
Stan loctite, not butter on those bolts, I've told you before. |
|
|
|
|
u33db
Affiliate
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 219
|
Posted:
Tue Jan 31, 2006 3:47 am |
|
|
|
|
|