chris or anyone help

Forum Moderator Joined: 16 Feb 2004 Posts: 1356

more fucking clio boys. I need evidence of phase 1 doing a sub 7.5 0-60.

The more the better

Retroholic Joined: 23 Dec 2005 Posts: 3315

http://youtube.com/watch?v=f5GcgqbWNwg&mode=related&search=acceleration

Forum Moderator Joined: 16 Feb 2004 Posts: 1356

cheers man already have that but thats not really a 0-60 is it?

Site Subscriber Joined: 13 Oct 2004 Posts: 4722

http://youtube.com/watch?v=OQHc13gqyh4&mode=related&search=acceleration

FCS Event Manager Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 3680

lol i dont think u guys get it

he wants a vid of a r19 16v doing 0 - 60mph

in other words, a camera showing the speedo whilst the car goes from rest to 60mph.

i've been looking for mine that i posted on here about 18 months ago which shows my dash from rest to 130mph but i canne find it Sad

Retroholic Joined: 23 Dec 2005 Posts: 3315

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8787688453797889848&q=renault+19

thas mine its like from 25-30 - 60 in 4-5secs on that video was ment to be a 0-60 run but aint the best lol

excuse for more hummmmmmmmm.....??? Rolling Eyes

FCS Event Manager Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 3680

i dont have that excuse, i would go out and do a video now of mine but . . my speedo does not work lol

Retroholic Joined: 23 Dec 2005 Posts: 3315

lol wounded

Level 4 User Joined: 10 Mar 2004 Posts: 89

Soneji";p="102216 wrote:

more fucking clio boys. I need evidence of phase 1 doing a sub 7.5 0-60.

The more the better

Didn't mean to start an argument about that, I was just telling them about my 197 drive Smile

I know it does 0-60 in low 7s.

Forum Moderator Joined: 16 Feb 2004 Posts: 1356

Evo";p="102235 wrote:

Soneji";p="102216 wrote:

more fucking clio boys. I need evidence of phase 1 doing a sub 7.5 0-60.

The more the better

Didn't mean to start an argument about that, I was just telling them about my 197 drive Smile

I know it does 0-60 in low 7s.

lol its not your fault man, just people not listening to reason... you could put your 2 cents in being the OP and confirm my 'exagerations' of the 8.2 second 1916v

Level 7 User Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 243

Is this a carry over from the thread on ocuk? Might have to finally register on there and put them straight.

Level 4 User Joined: 10 Mar 2004 Posts: 89

Soneji";p="102240 wrote:

Evo";p="102235 wrote:

Soneji";p="102216 wrote:

more fucking clio boys. I need evidence of phase 1 doing a sub 7.5 0-60.

The more the better

Didn't mean to start an argument about that, I was just telling them about my 197 drive Smile

I know it does 0-60 in low 7s.

lol its not your fault man, just people not listening to reason... you could put your 2 cents in being the OP and confirm my 'exagerations' of the 8.2 second 1916v

Already said I know it does it in low 7s on there Smile

I still want another 19, next year hopefully.

Forum Moderator Joined: 02 Mar 2004 Posts: 19978

problem is autocar got one that done it in 8.5, a ph2 and wouldn't go over 125 mph, so crap like that doesn't help!

Site Subscriber Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 569

What've the nobs on OcUK been getting wrong now?

Level 9 User Joined: 07 Dec 2005 Posts: 373

whats ocuk?can someone give me a link to the thread?

Level 7 User Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 243

valver";p="102297 wrote:

whats ocuk?can someone give me a link to the thread?

Its a computer hardware site, has its own "motors" section.

Linky:
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=17603763

*edit* If you dislike the modeo whatever you do dont tell on there, you will never hear the end of it.

Site Subscriber Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 569

For once I actualy agree with what most of them are saying on OcuK.

But seeing as I got banned and most of them are wankers, I won't continue the argument over here Smile

Site Subscriber Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 502

Bullshit.

It's how it corner's

FCS Event Manager Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 3680

Hmmmm interesting thread on OC.

There are so many variables that need to be considered thou, even with a standard non modified car when comparing 0-60 times.

no two cars are exactly alike even from new, you could get two brand new ph1 16V's off the factory floor and they would both put in different 0-60 times, then there is the weather, the track/road conditions, the driver, how much fuel its got on board, the octane rating etc etc.

0-60 times by manufactors are a guide and must only be considered as just that, a guide!

Level 7 User Joined: 12 Mar 2005 Posts: 243

Quote:

Ive got a Clio 16v with the same engine, the williams 2.0 as standard will only hit 136mph at full tilt from the factory. It might show 140mph indicated but it wont be going that fast.

Hes trying so hard to know things, shame the ratios are different on the williams and its got a lower rev limit Rolling Eyes

Site Subscriber Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 569

Peahole";p="102311 wrote:

Quote:

Ive got a Clio 16v with the same engine, the williams 2.0 as standard will only hit 136mph at full tilt from the factory. It might show 140mph indicated but it wont be going that fast.

Hes trying so hard to know things, shame the ratios are different on the williams and its got a lower rev limit Rolling Eyes

I think the pint he is mkaing is that a Clio Williams can only reach 136Mph 'factory' speed. So a R19 16v might show 140 on the clock but is probably closer to 125Mph.

Also, you're comparing two factors, 0-60 and top speed. Ok, important factors but they don't really 'make' a car, unless of course you're a kev who likes to show off 0-60 and 100+ Mph stunts to his neddy mates.

Would much rather have a car that handles and peforms in the corners etc