 |
|
| Hello, you are currently browsing to Retro-Renault Archive which is a copy of our old forum. You cannot post replies in this forum. Please click here to go to the active website.
|
| Author |
Message |
mals
Self Proclaimed Comic Genius
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 3482
|
| Posted:
Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:58 am |
|
|
|
|
Addie
Site Subscriber
Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 1141
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:25 am |
|
When I was 19 with my R19 16v with 2 years NCB I was paying £590 TPFT.
Now I'm 20 and 3yrs NCB on my Cordoba (grp 15, same as valver) I'm payin £480 TPFT.
Norwich Union |
|
|
|
|
Stephen
Level 8 User
Joined: 14 Apr 2004
Posts: 278
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:09 am |
|
24
Car - 2yrs NCB
Clio 1.2
£700 TPFT (Inc little sis £500 w/out)
Quinn Direct
Clio 16V
£TOOMUCH TPO
Not insured 
Bike - 2yrs NCB
Ducati Monster 600
£347 TPFT (£229 when 25)
Adelaide |
|
|
|
|
JB
Mr Quoter-vator
Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 7405
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:30 am |
|
r u sayin its cheaper to insure the ducati monster than the clio 16v? |
|
|
|
|
Chris H
Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:32 am |
|
bikes are normally cheaper.
They tend to not be used everyday, when they do crash the damage is less etc. |
|
|
|
|
mals
Self Proclaimed Comic Genius
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 3482
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:33 am |
|
To the vehicle though not the rider |
|
|
|
|
Stephen
Level 8 User
Joined: 14 Apr 2004
Posts: 278
|
| Posted:
Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:50 am |
|
| mals wrote: |
| To the vehicle though not the rider |
Indeed!
Put it this way, there are alot less personal injury claims than for cars...
I think the Clio 16V was around a grand which is way too much for what performance it offers.
Bikes are alot cheaper to insure, I think I can now insure an R1 (170 mph ish) which is in one of the top insurance groups for around £700 TPO.
I was paying more than that at 21 for the Monster! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
