Retro-Renault Archive Forum Index  
SEARCH THE ARCHIVE FORUMS  •  Log in
Hello, you are currently browsing to Retro-Renault Archive which is a copy of our old forum. You cannot post replies in this forum. Please click here to go to the active website. 
 supercharging F7P?
Author Message
Neal
Forum Moderator

Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 7432

Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 1:42 pm

ive been looking at superchargers recently.

Ebay usually has a number of them on there, and i dont mean the silly electric PC fan type, but the proper type as fitted to the BMW mini.

The Eaton M45:

http://www.automotive.eaton.com/product/engine_controls/M45.html

These are quite appealing...

If i were to fabricate a manifold and mounts to fit the unit to the F7P, and took a longer belt off the aux drive to power it, would I need very much more in the way of mods to be up and running?
Neal
Forum Moderator

Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 7432

Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 1:45 pm

oh yeah, and i appreciate that running crazy boost on the stock engine setup would be foolish... but thats easily sorted with pulley size isnt it?
Chris H
Forum Moderator

Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978

Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 2:18 pm

the reason theres so many of these about just now is the bmw S has an upgrade and it involves a better charger.

Yep basically your right.

You have not however compensated for the fueling.

Also once again I would like to try and get rid of the whole boost thing, more boost doesn't mean more power!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Neal
Forum Moderator

Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 7432

Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:18 pm

Chris the way I understood it (or thought i did), the lambda takes care of fuelling adjustments?

Or do you mean that the stock setup couldnt flow enough to satisfy?

In that case id need bigger injectors, and an adjustable fuel pressure regulator?
stan
Gay Rights Activist

Joined: 07 Apr 2004
Posts: 1268

Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2004 4:33 pm

the lambda sensor adjusts back 2 stoichiometric yes, but it doesnt have the scope to adjust to cope with boost.
u can buy a turbo fastchip 4 the F7P for 350 euros (it says 585 iirc on the site, but i emailed Henk and asked wot (I mean what really) the best price he could do 1 for). or u can buy a 5th injector set-up, that uses a second lambda sensor to control 5th injector to keep fuelling to wotever level u set it 2. this is not ideal however since no inlet manifold has perfect distribution i.e. 1 cylinder may run lean since the injector is at a common point.

also, look at the supercharged clio on ebay. it has the sc integrated in2 the inlet manifold
Neal
Forum Moderator

Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 7432

Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 2:55 am

I could alternatively use megasquirt

http://www.bgsoflex.com/megasquirt.html

This just in itself appeals to me as well.
Chris H
Forum Moderator

Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 3:52 am

Righty Stan covered some of it.

You have positive boost. The MAP sensor in the cars is only a 1 BAr sensor, you need a 2 BAR sensor for it to give any sort of fuelign accuracy near atmospheric or true boost situations.

The stock ECU will not have a clue what to do with positive boost signals.

Lambda sensors are not used as often as you would think, idle, steady throttle and over run, accelerating or at wot (I mean what really) it is ignored. Thats why when you see a big jag etc boot it theres a puff of black smoke from the exhausts.

Boys on Migweb have used megasquirt, some have had problems with them but not many.
Neal
Forum Moderator

Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 7432

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 6:50 am

right, i shall doggedly trawl migweb tonight then...

want to mod something big Smile
JB
Mr Quoter-vator

Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 7405

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 7:18 am

what is megasquirt used for then? i havent read thr page yet but in a nutshell whats it good for?
Chris H
Forum Moderator

Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 8:23 am

its a programmable ECU.

Its self build too.
Neal
Forum Moderator

Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 7432

Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 8:45 am

If i break my engine with it, no big deal... as Chris will readily tell you, engines are ten a penny Smile

Its not clear to me yet how ignition is taken care of with megasquirt.
Ben P
Level 5 User

Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 107

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 3:48 am

Can I just ask, what are the injectors from the 21 turbo like? Presumably much higher flow rate and would they fit?

Does anybody know more about the fastchip turbo chip? I presume it is a pre-set map so would this be ok for a s/c conversion?

I guess what I am asking is could you replace the map sensor with a 2 bar jobbie, fit 21 turbo injectors and a turbo chip and run a supercharger effectively like this?
Chris H
Forum Moderator

Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 3:55 am

21t injectors will no doubt flow more.

But yes a 2 bar map, new injectors (may not be needed), ECU map suitable then yes it will work.
Ben P
Level 5 User

Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 107

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 5:13 am

One other thing. What measure is there to vent excess airflow when not on boost? ie at idle etc.

I would guess you need some kind of bypass valve or something, are these built into the charger or do you need to hook something up separately?
Chris H
Forum Moderator

Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 19978

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 5:41 am

don't bother with theat crap its not needed.

Some do have bypass valves or clutches.
Ben P
Level 5 User

Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 107

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 8:37 am

OK, do they require an oil feed? And am I right in thinking that the s/c should be mounted between the throttle body and the inlet manifold?
Neal
Forum Moderator

Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 7432

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 9:23 am

yeah its mounted between the TB and the manifold (or can be integrated).

The SC is driven by the engine directly, so the speed (boost) of the super charger is always directly proportional to engine speed. Therefore no blow off valves or wastegate needed. Can adjust the boost by using a different size pulley to drive the SC...
Ben P
Level 5 User

Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 107

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 9:36 am

Yeah was thinking an M45 would be nice and cheap and probably wouldn't need any internal work as it doesn't flow huge amounts.

Alternator would probably need moving and manifold fabrication would be an arse.
Neal
Forum Moderator

Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 7432

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 9:47 am

the way i see it, the s/c would take up the space currently inhabited by the stock inlet manifold, and a little stubby manifold (needs investigation) to mate it with the head.

drive belt would be relatively easy.
Ben P
Level 5 User

Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 107

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 11:08 am

Yeah but where would you go to get that made up?

I was thinking it might be easier to mount sc underneath inlet manifold and link the 2 via an intercooler or charge cooler. That way you wouldn't need to chop about with inlet manifold or sc and could just get some brackets made up for the connecting pipes/hoses.

Make sense?
Evo
Level 4 User

Joined: 10 Mar 2004
Posts: 89

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 1:44 pm

Rip out the ps pump and rack, stick the SC in there.
Display posts from previous:      


 Jump to:   




SPIDER ARCHIVE
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group :: FI Theme :: All times are GMT - 7 Hours
ScriptWiz.com phpbb HTML Archiver - Created by ScriptWiz.com and released by Skinz.org