| Author |
Message |
coupesteve
Newbie
Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 16
|
| Posted:
Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:07 am |
|
2000 W Reg 2.0 16v Renault Megane Coupe IDE Monaco
HPI Clear, certificate to Prove
Glasses Valuation came up as £4,495 with the cars current milage, so this is a steal at 3700 considering is condition and care.
Onto the car:
140BHP
Rare Model in Hologram Grey
2 owners
85,000miles
Air Con
Full Leather
Electric Sunroof
Electric Mirrors
ABS
Factory Cat1 Alarm
16" Factory Alloys
FSH, very recent cambelt change, well mainted and serviced
11 Months MOT and 6 months Tax
Nice original car in SPOTLESS condition, never had any problems with the car, very reliable.
For anyone that doesnt know, its not a diesel, IDE mean Injection Directe Essence, in English, Direct Injection, gives it good performance whilst still maintaining good economy, 35-45mpg average.
BASED IN WORCESTERSHIRE
Tel
mob: 007957920077
home: 01386 791595
Email: steve@stevejwilliams.co.uk
PICS
thanks |
|
|
|
|
Wicked Neo
FCS Event Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2005
Posts: 3680
|
| Posted:
Sun Feb 05, 2006 2:07 pm |
|
That certainly is one very nice looking Megane!
Out of my price range sadly but i just had to comment on how nice it looks.
Why are you selling it? |
|
|
|
|
Roger Red Hat
Site Subscriber
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 4722
|
| Posted:
Sun Feb 05, 2006 2:13 pm |
|
ive never seen one that looks like that before.. |
|
|
|
|
Wicked Neo
FCS Event Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2005
Posts: 3680
|
| Posted:
Sun Feb 05, 2006 2:18 pm |
|
Its gorgeous, if i had the cash i would seriously be thinking of adding it to my collection |
|
|
|
|
coupesteve
Newbie
Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 16
|
| Posted:
Sun Feb 05, 2006 3:57 pm |
|
| Wicked Neo";p="81118 wrote: |
That certainly is one very nice looking Megane!
Out of my price range sadly but i just had to comment on how nice it looks.
Why are you selling it? |
thanks for the comments, no real reason, just fancied a change, am getting a leon cupra instead 
i could flex to maybe 3500 if someone was to bring me some cash 
i need a quick sale as iv got a deposit on the leon you see which is why im willing to let it go for well under the book price |
|
|
|
|
Roger Red Hat
Site Subscriber
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 4722
|
| Posted:
Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:39 pm |
|
|
|
|
coupesteve
Newbie
Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 16
|
| Posted:
Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:02 pm |
|
|
|
|
Roger Red Hat
Site Subscriber
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 4722
|
| Posted:
Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:31 pm |
|
|
|
|
Wicked Neo
FCS Event Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2005
Posts: 3680
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 06, 2006 9:50 am |
|
| coupesteve";p="81153 wrote: |
eh? lol
|
he means i should sell my laguna so i can buy your megane lol
my laguna would not sell for that price roger, yeah its a 2000 with 36,000 miles but its a 1.6 RT Laguna 1 Ph2 lol |
|
|
|
|
cockney
Level 3 User
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 66
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:14 pm |
|
Very Nice, didnt know they did a IDE Monaco, Renault should of given them more power though, 200bhp or so, seen as it little bro, the clio has 182 *thinking out loud* |
|
|
|
|
coupesteve
Newbie
Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 16
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:20 pm |
|
IDE has a lot more torque than the VVT lumps in the 172/182
Independant test figs of 7.4 0-60 doesnt make it a million miles away either.
Also weight is pretty similar in the two vehicles |
|
|
|
|
cockney
Level 3 User
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 66
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:36 pm |
|
|
|
|
coupesteve
Newbie
Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 16
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:39 pm |
|
haha wtf is that site on about!! for a start it covers 1996 to 2003, ph1 all had different engines to ph2 for a start
only online link iv got is parkers buts those are a load of crap 8.2 i think
read the independant in evo mag |
|
|
|
|
cockney
Level 3 User
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 66
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:43 pm |
|
|
|
|
cockney
Level 3 User
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 66
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:45 pm |
|
| coupesteve";p="81334 wrote: |
IDE has a lot more torque than the VVT lumps in the 172/182
|
It hasnt
| coupesteve";p="81334 wrote: |
Also weight is pretty similar in the two vehicles
|
Not even close |
|
|
|
|
cockney
Level 3 User
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 66
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:50 pm |
|
Not trying to be a knob mate, just trying to people the right information before they make an informed decision to buy your motor…. |
|
|
|
|
coupesteve
Newbie
Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 16
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:52 pm |
|
my weight = 1135
182=1090
less than a person extra weight
and the later ph2's coupes have a tamed 182 lump in 2003, torque is significantly more in comparison
you do realise that renault test there vehicles with a passengar some luggage and a full tank of fuel.
pug do the same, so not sure if its a french thing
the 106 gti was timed at 8.4 or summit, but the VTS was 7.2 both cars are identical, why do u think the 106 was different? different timing methods, similar to this instance |
|
|
|
|
cockney
Level 3 User
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 66
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:12 pm |
|
| coupesteve";p="81345 wrote: |
the 106 gti was timed at 8.4 or summit, but the VTS was 7.2 both cars are identical, why do u think the 106 was different? different timing methods, similar to this instance
|
Just been over to the pug forum, mark kindly told me that the VTS is quicker because it weighs less (GTI better build quality) and the VTS has slight more torque higher up the rev range.. |
|
|
|
|
cockney
Level 3 User
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 66
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:13 pm |
|
| coupesteve";p="81345 wrote: |
you do realise that renault test there vehicles with a passengar some luggage and a full tank of fuel.
|
Not on sports models....
Anyway..Good luck with the sale mate. |
|
|
|
|
coupesteve
Newbie
Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 16
|
| Posted:
Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:20 pm |
|
okies, its true about the pugs, the build quality is no better, they use all the same parts, trust me i had one for a year
its wrong of me to try and compare it to a 182 as the 182 is clearly a faster car. The point im trying to make is they are underestiamted, you obviously at first instance thought they were a lot slower than they are |
|
|
|
|
Chet T16
Retroholic
Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Posts: 5685
|
| Posted:
Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:27 pm |
|
| cockney";p="81352 wrote: |
| coupesteve";p="81345 wrote: |
the 106 gti was timed at 8.4 or summit, but the VTS was 7.2 both cars are identical, why do u think the 106 was different? different timing methods, similar to this instance
|
Just been over to the pug forum, mark kindly told me that the VTS is quicker because it weighs less (GTI better build quality) and the VTS has slight more torque higher up the rev range.. |
Bollocks, on all points.
Saxo has different gear ratios to give it a quicker 0-60 where the 106 will hammer it everywhere else |
|
|
|
|
|
|
